In the 19th century, Parisian women were confined by the same restrictions and double
standards experienced by women in England, the United States, and pretty much the rest of the world. A
married women was considered to be the property of her husband, who also legally owned whatever property
she used to have. Many marriages were arranged by fathers. Women were told to be passive, and submissive
to men. A double standard allowed a husband to go out at night and mingle with others, while his wife
had to stay home and tend the household. This was a part of the code known today as the
Separate Spheres. This doctrine established
two domains of life: the public and the private, or domestic. Traditionally, the husband would be in
charge of the public domain (work, finances, legal and civic matters) while the wife would be in charge
of the private domain (cooking, raising children, sewing, running the household). The extension was
that men could venture out in public alone, while women had to stay out of the public eye, unless
accompanied by a man. Ladies were even prohibited from crossing a ballroom floor alone, unaccompanied
by a gentleman.
Have you seen the French Apache dance? In Irene Castle's words, this was a dance "in which the
male dancer tries to demolish the female dancer, as spectacularly as possible, and usually
succeeds." Surprisingly, the Apache remained a popular cabaret act for over sixty years, from
shortly after 1900 through the 1960s.
A common misperception today is that the Apache dance was condoned violence against women. Another
misconception is that it was male backlash against emerging women's independence and freedoms
at the turn of the last century. It's certainly understandable why people might believe these
things, given the dramatic appearance of the dance.
The real story is more interesting than that. In fact, the Apache dance was created by
a woman, as a statement of independence and empowerment.
If you're a historian, you know that a common pitfall in the field is judging earlier events by
today's standards. History is a one-way street that only moves forward, from an earlier perspective,
and the only way to understand the motives that propelled events forward is to understand the mindsets
of the earlier eras. Women's independence and empowerment have come a long way in the past century, and
if you judge the Apache dance by today's standards, you'll miss the significance that
this dance had for women back then.
So let's go back two hundred years.
In Paris, women were allowed to briefly step outside of these restrictions once a year during Carnival,
which was notoriously a time of breaking society's rules. For the few days before Lent, culminating with Mardi Gras, women could
speak in an unguarded manner and exchange insults, smoke and drink, travel without accompaniment and dress
as a man. Beginning in the 1830s, some of these freedoms were
extended to the "bal public" dance gardens of Paris. That's a long story in itself, but essentially
the lorettes and the dancers at the bals publics led the way to an emerging women's independence by the
end of the 19th century. These women acquired their financial independence, which gave them the freedom to
practice many activities which were formerly only allowed for men, such as owning a house, having a
political opinion and being able to freely explain it, going out anywhere alone, and writing novels
or memoirs for money. They were some of the first Parisian women to treat men as equals, which
was why many men were so fond of them — this was new, and more exciting than most women they knew.
One of these women was Mistinguette. She dared to step out of the private domestic sphere into the public
eye, performing as a singer and dancer onstage, around 1900. One of her early dance partners was Maurice
Chavalier (far right photo), an unknown singer ten years younger than Mistinguette. Side note: In 1909 she changed the spelling
of her stage name to Mistinguett, dropping the final e, but we haven't reached that date yet so we're keeping the early spelling.
Let's temporarily leave Mistinguette, to look at the underworld of the Apaches at this time, around
1900. These were members of street gangs in Montmartre, Belleville and the Barrières, who committed
crimes of great violence, that were in turn covered sensationally in the local newspapers. These hooligans were mostly
young men, who swaggered with an arrogant pride, dressed distinctively and were "handy with
a knife."
After a particularly heinous crime in 1902, the newspaper reporter Authur Dupin wrote the
headline "Crime Committed by the Apaches of Belleville," referring to the perceived savagery of the
American Indians as described in James Fenimore Cooper novels, popular at that time. The French pronounce
it ah-PAHSH, and the term stuck.
Now we skip ahead to 1908.
Max Dearly (in the left-side photo) was a Parisian entertainer – an actor and dancer. Maurice Mouvet (in the right-side photo)
was an American dancer, born in New York City but working in Paris in 1908. These two men both claimed to have
invented the Apache dance in 1908. Plenty of press releases, posters and photos confirm that Max Dearly performed it in
1908 with Mistinguette, in the Moulon Rouge show La Revue du Moulin, as depicted below.
The Apache became a sensation in 1908. At the left above is a poster of Mistinguette and Dearly's 1908 Apache.
At the right is a beautiful large sculpture (in my collection) from the same year.
The upper right corner of this sheet music cover says, "The Apach's Dance. Created and arranged by Monsieur Max
Dearly." All of the sources that I found, from 1908 to all of today's Web pages on the subject, pass on the story
that one of these two men - or both - created the Apache dance.
But when Mistinguett wrote her autobiography
later in her life, she claimed that she had created the concept, before 1908, and that Max Dearly was
only one of her later partners. Which side was telling the truth?
The answer is on page two (click here).
© Copyright 2012 Richard Powers